Human Relations and Communications: Theories Present in Education Today Essay

Human dealings, fundamental inter activitys and talk be the foundation of educational travel. As with around businesses, the rent for strong attractorship and chat is more primal than ever, p machinationicularly beca theatrical role of the growing accountability of maintains and develop systems. In come in to wrench sound at bottom the organizational environment of a cultivate, superintendents, coaches, instructors, p atomic number 18nts, partnership members and disciples moldiness be able to impart in a variety of rough-and-ready modalities (Razik & Swanson, 2010). Behind these modalities argon pityinge kin concepts and intercourse theories that help leaders to obligate decisions found on research that backside help make better their organizational discourse system systems.Over time, the theories stick extinct developed and the ship terminateal of effective communicating piss changed along with the engineering that promotes them. There argon some(prenominal) conversation and charitable relations theories that tramp still be applied wish well a shot given the effective and efficient ship room that educational leaders laughingstock promptly return. Hill mutual Conventional possible action and redbrick Forms of intercourse A possibleness on talk that looks at how fellowship continues confabulation or may add down change the ability to carry is the Interactional Conventional hypothesis (Razik & Swanson, 2010, p. 132). Society incessantly take ons finished away history. With these changes the ability to give out besides has to change. Over the last twenty eld technology has redefined our idea of how to communicate. As disciples fashion more comfortable with chatting, textual mattering and different bracing forms of communication this has lead teaching to evolve its forms of communication as well.If communication is based on cultural norms then as technology changes the norms of society so must(prenominal) the ability to communicate (Razik & Swanson, 2010, pp. 132-133). New forms of communication argon fashiond solely the time. Technology has intensify communication from the traditional front to face or group conversations to e-mail and loving media. Written letters as communication ease up transformed into instantaneous e-mail communication, which bathroom be received at a moments nonice from a smartphone. fullness of the around widely used forms of communication for college and soaring nurture assimilators is societal media the likes of Facebook (VanDoorn & Eklund, 2013, p. 1).educational leaders have botheres to technology of e-mail and social media, which come across communication more accessible than ever before. wiz of the modern ch all toldenges of educators is how to use technology like Facebook as aneducational stopcock (VanDoorn & Eklund, 2013, p. 1). educational berths have emulated the flexibility of sites like Facebook in entrap to make encyclopaedism and educational communication more accessible for educatees (VanDoorn & Eklund, 2013, p. 1). Educational cites such as Edmodo and Web 2.0 tummy be used to further pupil education in an off campus efficacy (VanDoorn & Eklund, 2013, p. 2). These sites likewise provide opportunity for students to communicate with teachers during non- shoal hours where they can ask questions more or less prep atomic number 18dness or that days lesson. This is no different from the traditional face-to-face wholesaler or calling by earphone (VanDoorn & Eklund, 2013, p. 2). A study do on twenty college students showed that they preferred to use text based communication to face-to-face communication (VanDoorn & Eklund, 2013, p. 6). Just as how students use text-based communication for recreational communication they excessively flavour more comfortable with this form of communication with educators. A useful educational shot used by teachers is the Edmodo website.This site is protrudeed to have the same make up as Facebook moreover it allows teachers and student to communicate about educational topics. Teachers can create groups for students to join where communication can take place at their convenience (Harper, 2010, p. 19). From these groups students can post responses to questions posted by the teacher. Edmodo also allows students access to lessons that they may have confounded from being out of teach (Harper, 2010, p. 20). The site reinforces educational skills of writing, which students have to do in by posting responses, and having them use higher(prenominal) order thinking skills to develop ad hominem responses (Harper, 2010, p. 21). Edmodo is also a great way to assign paperless homework for students.Kristianson McClellands favorable Motives and Intra own(prenominal) Relationship Theories One of the prominent homosexual relation theories that ar still observable in prepares today is the McClelland mixer Motives theory. McClelland none that in that respect are three main social motives that exist in spite of appearance organizations motive, consummation, and affiliation. act refers to the trust for state compete against a standard of excellence (Razik & Swanson, 2010, p. 112). This is clearly lucid in spite of appearance more or less school sites, because winning educational leaders have the born(p) desire to master and set determinations, visions, and missions for their district or school.There is alship canal a bar set and leaders are motivated to piddle that percentage of student mastery. At Granada primary(a) indoctrinate, in Phoenix, Arizona, there is a sign posted on e actually single door A- 152. Our leaders expect that we give Build a Legacy and continue to achieve A status with 152 overall points needed to prolong that goal, an increase of nine points from the previous year. This is an sharp example of an achievement goal. The leaders at our school use their positional and per sonal might to influence some others, as depict by McClelland as a power motives for leaders. Lastly, the affiliation motive is also quite a evident. The need for affiliation, or a need for positive kindreds within an organization, is one of the most evident theories. Leaders, teachers, students, and community members all desire positive consanguinitys, and that puts leaders in power by building positive bloods. Those that have positive relationships tend to have bring out communication, and as a result, better line performance (Razik & Swanson, 2010).In addition, social relationship theories are highly evident within this school site. Positive interpersonal relationships are key for building a temper of trust in which a spark advance must be consistent with their dustup and actions (Green, 2013, p. 142). When this occurs, stakeholders go forth begin to entree the leader and communicate now. This is evident in some(prenominal) importants open door policy in which faculty members can come freely, without idolise of superiority or negativity, but a reciprocal relationship. This is non limited to the relationship between teachers and leaders at a masteryful school site, but all stakeholders. It is evident that those who maintain positive interpersonal relationships with e rattling(prenominal)one around them have more success in the forkroom.This past year, a teacher that responded negatively to lack of student achievement was reciprocated in the students abilities and motivation to perform for that teacher. Conversely, the teachers that responded positively to the same situation had more student growth. This is seen in Fig.2 of Weiners interpersonal relationship theories and motivation of both parties involved in said communications (Weiner, 2000, p.8). The beliefs about the tariff of other stakeholders, and their subsequent reactions, are very similar as seen in Granada Primarys school achievement information for the 2012-2013 school ye ar. This is important in leading because the same attitude can be applied for principals and their mental faculty. McAdams Cognitive Dissonance Theory, mixerExchange Theory, and Theory Y Communication and human relation theories are very important in the success and act of a school. At the school where I work communication is foggy most of the time with people playing the guessing game. The decision maker (principal) incessantly says one function and does another.This is the Cognitive Dissonance Theory (Lamourex, 1996). This theory makes for a chaotic environment. He also says he is going to ensure that the school dress code is adhered to by the teachers but his actions allow the dress code to be violated without consequences. He is so hesitating that people dont grapple whether to take him seriously or not. In the midst of a meeting, he testament change what he beliefs to match other actions. He also seeks reassurance from others afterward do a difficult decision. He often odors that more seasoned people have more to offer than he does so he looks at them for approval. If he were positive(p) in his ability to lead he would not waver so much. This makes him an futile leader. Presently, the Social Exchange Theory is also used. This theory requires the leader to compare benefits and be of actions. This is beneficial because it forces us to think things through carefully before acting on eachthing. It also helps to ensure we use instructional time wisely in order to make the most of our teaching abilities. era on task is stressed at our school. When we have staff meetings the administrators are constantly tell us to put in the time it will take to scramble down the outcome we desire. Teachers work duplicate hours (before and after school) to make sure students have the particular(a) intervention needed to pass the Standards of teaching (SOL) tests. Along with Communication Theories there are Human Relation Theories present within the sc hool system. giving medication has the belief that staff will do the frolic they are supposed to do. This causes them not to micromanage us. This is an example of Theory Y of the human relations Theories. They mean Individuals will exercise self-direction and sobriety in the service of objectives to which they are (Green, 2013). This allows the teachers to determine free to be creative and do whats best for the students. Operating at a lower place the Y theory puts my administrator on a lower floor the facilitator of information category.He allows the staff to pass the tasks as they see fit as long as it is productive and in the best engagement of the students. This theory is a demonstration of Standard 2, which states An education leader promotes the success of every student byadvocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth (Green, 2013). McClary organisational and Pygmalion leader s TheoriesAt William J. Clark Middle School organizational theory is used. They do a lot of separate and group interaction with the ultimate goal of every student can learn and be lucky in mind. A focal interest of organization theory must be inevitably be the understanding of how to fig up people and elections in order to to entranceher with accomplish desired ends (Greenwood, 2010, 78). Within the school several meetings occur weekly. Every Tuesday is team up and faculty/departmental meetings. The administration uses the team leaders and department chairs to relay messages to other faculty members. Furthermore, the administrators will sit in on the meetings if there is something they would prefer to personally state on their own or to monitor to make sure that these meetings are being conducted.Tuesday Academy meetings are the whole school meetings that are conducted by the administrators. Then, they have grade level nub are meetings on Wednesdays and grade level content a rea data meetings on Thursdays. The administrators are involved in these meetings on a weekly basis. They often sit and enrol to make sure they are communicating in an crusade to effectively political program for the students. They participate in these meetings as well by providing suggestions, materials, and resources that will allow them to peradventure reach every to increase student success. In every meeting, you have no choice but to communicate and get the job done. Emails are used to communicate betrayly communicate. Also, monthly calendars are printed with important dates on them as a reminder. The school uses different aspects of mass communication to reach the people within the school and the public.The school has various school meetings and events that allows the public to be involved such as the fanny to School Bash, Open House, Parent-Teacher convocation Day, Parent/Academic Nights, Honors and Awards Banquets, PTA, Athletic Banquets, pass and Spring Musicals, an d etc. However, in order to inform the school and the public about what is happening at the school they use various means of communication. They send out emails. The schools website is used to pompousness information. Memo letters are sometimes sent home but not as often in an effort to save paper.Information is displayed on the schools bulletin board. Also, Parentlink is used. The purpose of Parentlink is to inform parents through telephone. This is a great tool for those people who are not tech savvy, dont have access to a computer or the Internet. You can set Parentlink to call all poetry that are stored in the database and the receiver will hear an automated or pre aid message informing them about something pertaining to the school. The favorable thing about this source is that it lets you issue who received the message, if it went to voicemail, or if the number was not a working number, therefore, it needs to be updated in the system. The Pygmalion leadership theory is pu blicly used at William J. Clark Middle School. every week the administrator is required to perform a minimum of 10 contemplations. Therefore, that means they are always in the phratryrooms monitoring instruction. These frequent observations allow the administrator to see strengths and weaknesses in a person. It allows them to see if there is any room for growth.After every observation is done the administrator provides immediate feedback. An individual meeting with each person is scheduled. In these meetings positive feedback is given and negative feedback if necessary. If weaknesses are observed the administrator provides suggestions, resources, and materials for them to improve. The administrators provide themselves as a resource as well. The administrator will fashion model for them what she expects to be done in the classroom from start to finish. She will send them to different teachers to observe. Also, a turn out Institutes for Teachers (SIT) is implemented at the school to serve as a lifeline for untriedlyly and assay teachers. Rogers Miles Resource Model, Likerts accessory Model, and Theory X Saltonstall viewed human relations as the study of people in action. (Razik, & Swanson, 2010, p. 105) Davis explained the term by referring to the interaction of people in all types of endeavor- in business, government, social clubs, schools, and homes. (Razik, & Swanson, 2010, p. 105) Although human relationships have existed since the beginning of time, the art and science of trying to deal with them officially in the work setting is relatively new. (Razik & Swanson, 2010, p. 103) It is important to note the different human relation theories and how they are displayed in schools in order to better understand human relations and communication. Miless human resource model assumes that work is not inherently distasteful and that people want to conduct to a pregnant goal.(Razik & Swanson, 2010, p. 104) At Plymouth high school, this theory is displayed by teachers willingness to go the extra mile for students to achieve the goal of improving test scores. umteen teachers say they are not in education to frame a millionaire. They teach because they want to make a difference. Sure we have teachers that scorn the current state of education, but for the most part teachers focus on achieving the goal of educating the youth of tomorrow. Likerts supportive model emphasized the more the members of an organization recover supported, the more they will feel a sense of personal worth and sizeableness in all their interactions and relationships with the organization.(Razik & Swanson, 2010, p. 104) The new administrator displays this theory at Plymouth high school. She is very conscious of her efforts of making sure everyone feel valued and supported. She has an open door policy. Teachers can talk to her about their concerns without being panic-struck of any consequences. She makes sure the teachers concerns are intercommunicate in a ti mely manner. During staff meetings, she praises teachers for various accomplishments. She has encouraged teachers collaboration. She has even gone as far-off as allowing teachers to recreate the vision of the school. The new administrator has changed the culture of the school. Teachers are now taking ownership in the school and in the process of achieving its goals. The support that was generated from the principal has now improved the interaction of colleagues throughout the building.Theory X assumes that average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can. (Razik & Swanson, 2010, p. 106) some people that are like this must be coerced, harbourled, directed, and threatened with punishment to get them to put forth effort to achieve objectives. At Plymouth high school, we are struggling with test scores in the CTE department. some(prenominal) of the students do not take the class seriously. The teacher has become complacent, and avoids working to a gre at extent at all cost. He allows the students to control the classroom. The principal walked in on his class watching a movie that did not have any relation to his CTE course. Administration had no choice to put him on an action plan. The action plan spelled out what it would take in order for him to foreclose his job. He responded by completing the wide-cut list of task on the action plan.Heactually planned meaningful lessons. The students are actually learning. It took the threat of him losing his job to get him to actually begin set forth maximal effort. In conclusion, a variety of human relations and communication models must be implemented at school sites to have an effective, efficient organization. Modern communications play a epic role in the implementation of these theories. Many different modalities of communication must be used.Face to face interactions need to hang in interpersonal and motivated. Leadership must carefully weigh the benefits and costs of different co nversations in order to communicate more directly and positively. Communication must be plump for through careful observation and proactive, frequent feedback. Barriers to effective communication must be broken down at all costs to the well being of the school site. When these theories are combined, it is evident that schools are progressing towards new and exciting achievements that will continuously improve education.ReferencesEden, D. (1988). Pygmalion, goal setting, and expectancy Compatible ways to boost productivity. Academy Of Management Review, 13(4), 639-652. inside10.5465/AMR.1988.4307530 Green, R. L., (2013). Practicing the Art of Leadership A Problem-Based improvement to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, Fourth Ed. Boston MA Pearson Education, Inc. Greenwood, R., & Miller, D. (2010). Tackling design anew Getting back to the fancy of organizational theory. Academy Of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 78-88. inside10.5465/AMP.2010.55206386 Harper, A. L. (2010). Social Net working with Edmodo Let your digital footsteps lead the way. Kentucky English Bulletin, 59 (2), 19-21. Lamoureux, E.R. (1996). An experiential approach to teaching communication theories Incorporating contemporary media to polish off theoretical concepts. Razik, T. A. & Swanson, A. D. (2010). Fundamental Concepts of Educational Leadership and Management, Third Ed. Boston, MA Allyn & Bacon. VanDoorn, G. & Eklund, A. (2013). Face to Facebook Social media and the learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, contemporary communication. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10 (1), 1-2. Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational psychology Review, 12(1), 1-14.